home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 785 
 Wilfred van Velzen to Tim Schattkowsky 
 Re^2: Problem ipv6 vs ipv4 
 24 Jun 22 08:33:42 
 
TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: UTF-8 2
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
MSGID: 2:280/464 62b5695c
REPLY: 2:240/1120.29 8cefcf84
Hi Tim,

On 2022-06-21 19:24:31, you wrote to Ulrich Schroeter:

 US>> ,5555,Nieuw_Schnoord,Driebergen,Michiel_van_der_Vlist,-Unpublished-,3
 US>> 00,M N,CM,MO,XW,IBN:fido.vlist.eu,IBN:fido4to6.vlis
 US>> t.eu,PING,TRACE,U,ENC,RPK,NPK,NC

 US>> and here you can find the related FQDNs
 US>> I would give it a try with these 2 listed FQDNs

 TS> Oh. So is this whole IPv4/IPv6 discussion here about the idea that WP
 TS> should try the other entry from the nodelist?

No that's another matter.

What WP should do is if a hostname resolves to multiple IP's (IPv6 or IPv4),
try them all in the order the OS presents them, until one succeeds.

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 124/5016 129/331 153/757 7715 203/0 221/0 229/110
SEEN-BY: 229/111 112 113 317 426 428 470 664 700 266/512 280/464 5003
SEEN-BY: 280/5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219
SEEN-BY: 341/234 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250
PATH: 280/464 712/848 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca