Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 825  |
|  Tim Schattkowsky to Martin Foster  |
|  Re: Inactive uplinks  |
|  10 Jan 23 03:28:39  |
 MSGID: 2:310/31.6 1bc76704 CHRS: UTF-8 4 TZUTC: 0100 REPLY: 2:280/464.27 0c96c382 //Hello Martin,// on *23.12.22* at *11:33:27* You wrote in Area *WINPOINT* to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"Inactive uplinks"*. MF> Hello Tim! MF> Pressed F12, clicked the "Uplinks" Tab, selected an uplink, clicked the MF> "Properties" button and then clicked the "Inactive" radio button. Then MF> clicked on the "Inactive" uplink in the "Poll" button pulldown and much MF> to my surprise, WinPoint polled the "Inactive" uplink. Looking at the MF> logfile for the session, I note that a "non-secure" session was MF> established. Hmmmmm, I don't see the point in polling an "Inactive" MF> uplink, perhaps I'm missing something? Jup. You poll a system, not an uplink. A system is just a BBS you can call. So when the uplink is disabled, no mail is exported for the uplink (among other things) and when you poll the system respective AKA for that particular uplink is not presented and no mail is sent. That is the intended behaviour. So enssentially disabling an uplink is meant to stop WinPoint from sending an mail using that network address. Regards, Tim --- WinPoint 412.0 * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:310/31.6) SEEN-BY: 1/19 15/0 16/0 19/37 80/1 106/201 124/5016 142/104 153/757 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 203/0 221/0 1 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 SEEN-BY: 229/114 307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 266/512 280/464 SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 SEEN-BY: 320/2119 341/66 234 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 5020/830 PATH: 310/31 280/464 203/0 320/219 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]