Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 830  |
|  Martin Foster to Tim Schattkowsky  |
|  Inactive uplinks  |
|  03 Feb 23 10:42:38  |
 MSGID: 2:280/464.27 2c654e04 CHRS: UTF-8 4 TZUTC: 0000 REPLY: 2:310/31.6 1bc76704 Hello Tim! *** Tuesday 10.01.23 2:28:39, Tim Schattkowsky wrote to Martin Foster: MF>> Pressed F12, clicked the "Uplinks" Tab, selected an uplink, clicked the MF>> "Properties" button and then clicked the "Inactive" radio button. Then MF>> clicked on the "Inactive" uplink in the "Poll" button pulldown and much MF>> to my surprise, WinPoint polled the "Inactive" uplink. Looking at the MF>> logfile for the session, I note that a "non-secure" session was MF>> established. Hmmmmm, I don't see the point in polling an "Inactive" MF>> uplink, perhaps I'm missing something? TS> Jup. Yeah, thought so ;) TS> You poll a system, not an uplink. A system is just a BBS you can call. OK, fair comment. TS> So when the uplink is disabled, no mail is exported for the uplink (among TS> other things) and when you poll the system respective AKA for that TS> particular uplink is not presented and no mail is sent. Mail is not received either, which is pretty obvious, as the session password is not presented. TS> That is the intended behaviour. OK, fine. TS> So enssentially disabling an uplink is meant to stop WinPoint from TS> sending an mail using that network address. Ah, Aha, NOW I understand and thanks for the explanation :) Regards, Martin --- WinPoint 411.0 * Origin: WinPoint Test Rig - UK - (2:280/464.27) SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 124/5016 153/757 7715 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 114 307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 341/66 234 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 PATH: 280/464 292/854 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]