home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 830 
 Martin Foster to Tim Schattkowsky 
 Inactive uplinks 
 03 Feb 23 10:42:38 
 
MSGID: 2:280/464.27 2c654e04
CHRS: UTF-8 4
TZUTC: 0000
REPLY: 2:310/31.6 1bc76704
Hello Tim!

*** Tuesday 10.01.23 2:28:39, Tim Schattkowsky wrote to Martin Foster:

 MF>> Pressed F12, clicked the "Uplinks" Tab, selected an uplink, clicked the
 MF>> "Properties" button and then clicked the "Inactive" radio button. Then
 MF>> clicked on the "Inactive" uplink in the "Poll" button pulldown and much
 MF>> to my surprise, WinPoint polled the "Inactive" uplink. Looking at the
 MF>> logfile for the session, I note that a "non-secure" session was
 MF>> established. Hmmmmm, I don't see the point in polling an "Inactive"
 MF>> uplink, perhaps I'm missing something?

 TS> Jup.

Yeah, thought so ;)

 TS> You poll a system, not an uplink. A system is just a BBS you can call.

OK, fair comment.

 TS> So when the uplink is disabled, no mail is exported for the uplink (among
 TS> other things) and when you poll the system respective AKA for that
 TS> particular uplink is not presented and no mail is sent.

Mail is not received either, which is pretty obvious, as the session password
is not presented.

 TS> That is the intended behaviour.

OK, fine.

 TS> So enssentially disabling an uplink is meant to stop WinPoint from
 TS> sending an mail using that network address.

Ah, Aha, NOW I understand and thanks for the explanation :)

Regards,
Martin

--- WinPoint 411.0
 * Origin: WinPoint Test Rig - UK - (2:280/464.27)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 124/5016 153/757 7715 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114
SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 114 307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31
SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 341/66 234 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848
PATH: 280/464 292/854 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca