On 08-18-13, mark lewis said the following...
 
 ml>  rw> Yes, it is.
 ml> 
 ml> i thought it was... and seeing the mystic tearline, i knew that you
 ml> probably had set everything to default to using the nicknames and hadn't
 ml> yet gotten around to adjusting the fidonet echos to use real names ;)

Heh, yeah, slowly but surely making those customizations as time permits :)

 ml>  ml> and here i thought your bbs was Buffalo Online as inducated in the
 ml>  ml> nodelist for that FTN address ;)
 ml> 
 ml> AFAIK, the NC generally makes updates to the segments when they are
 ml> requested to update them by the sysop the entry if for... in this case,
 ml> i would say that you have two requests to send out... one to each NC
 ml> with the changes for your entry in their segment...

Heh, I will have to bring that to his attention then :)

 ml> FWIW: you might also have helped them to find a bug in the processing if
 ml> their segment updates aren't making it all the way up the line... i know
 ml> i've helped a few others working where problems were in the flow from
 ml> the NC thru the RC and up to the ZC...

Me?  Find bugs?  NEVER!  Perish the thought! :)

--- Mystic BBS-W4/v1.10 A37 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: RiverNet BBS * Memphis TN * bbs.rivernet.us (1:116/18)