On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:47:30 -0800 (PST), dmunz 
wrote:

>Given that it didn't actually hit the cat, not harm, no foul.  I don't think
there is a cat union that would lobby for hazard duty pay or a stunt double in
these scenarios...

These days, it was probably a CGI apple.

==============================
My (very old) XF page: http://www.mjq.net/xfiles

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)