On Thursday, 28 January 2016 12:26:39 UTC-5, Mr. Mike  wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:47:30 -0800 (PST), dmunz 
> wrote:
>
> >Given that it didn't actually hit the cat, not harm, no foul.  I don't
think there is a cat union that would lobby for hazard duty pay or a stunt
double in these scenarios...
>
> These days, it was probably a CGI apple.
>
> ==============================
> My (very old) XF page: http://www.mjq.net/xfiles

It was a real apple. She hit GA with it twice, in fact.

https://twitter.com/GillianA/status/692392338635759618

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)